The Milgram experiment was a famous psychological study conducted in the 1960s that explored the concept of obedience. The study was designed to measure how willing people were to obey an authority figure, even when doing so meant harming another person. The results of the study showed that people were surprisingly willing to obey authority, even when it meant causing harm to others. The study has been widely criticized for its ethical problems, but it remains an important part of psychological research.
What is Milgram's theory of obedience? Milgram's theory of obedience posits that people have a strong tendency to obey authority figures, even when doing so goes against their personal conscience. This theory was first proposed by Stanley Milgram in the 1960s, in the wake of the Nazi war crimes trials. Milgram's research found that people were far more likely to obey an authority figure who told them to do something that was potentially harmful, even if they did not believe that what they were doing was right. This theory has been used to explain a variety of phenomena, from the actions of Nazi soldiers during the Holocaust to the horrific abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
What did we learn from the Milgram experiment?
The Milgram experiment was a study conducted in the 1960s that examined how people respond to authority figures. The study found that people are more likely to obey authority figures than their own conscience. The study has been used to explain why people obey orders, even when they may be unethical or harmful. The study has been criticized for its methods and ethics, but it remains an important piece of research in the field of psychology.
What factors led to obedience in the Milgram study?
There are a number of factors that likely led to obedience in the Milgram study. First, the participants were told that the study was about memory and learning, and that they would be administering electric shocks to another person as part of the experiment. This may have led them to believe that the shocks would not be harmful, and that they were simply following orders. Second, the experiment was conducted in a laboratory setting, which may have made the participants feel more comfortable and less likely to question the authority of the experimenter. Third, the experimenter was a credible authority figure, which may have made the participants more likely to obey his instructions. Finally, the participants were given a monetary incentive for participating in the study, which may have made them more willing to follow the experimenter's instructions.
What was one key aspect of Milgram's experiment on obedience?
Milgram's experiment on obedience was a key aspect in the development of our understanding of how people respond to authority figures. The experiment showed that people are more likely to obey an authority figure even when asked to do something that goes against their personal moral code. The experiment has been criticized for its ethics, but it remains an important part of our understanding of human behavior.
How does obedience affect behavior? There are a few different ways that obedience can affect behavior. First, when people are told to do something, they are more likely to do it if they believe that the person giving the instruction has the authority to do so. This is why it is important for managers to be clear about their expectations and to give employees clear instructions. Secondly, people are more likely to obey someone who they perceive as being fair and just. This means that if employees feel that their managers are being fair and consistent in their expectations, they are more likely to obey them. Finally, people are more likely to obey someone who they believe is competent and capable. This means that if employees feel that their managers are knowledgeable and have the ability to get the job done, they are more likely to obey them.